I would disagree on the second point, as this trail marker is a representative of the trail which is obviously for pedestrians and walking. It's clear that we cannot simply nominate the trail itself,… (View Post)

Even going with that, by 3.1 criteria, I didn't think that swimming pools were an automatic rejection anymore either. (View Post)

Well, that was just an example, but specifically in terms of a waterfall, I have been to many where you can get right up to it, or even behind the water flow. That said, I also no longer see a requir… (View Post)

I do not see that natural features are excluded anymore, and the criteria states: "Must be a permanent physical, tangible, and identifiable place or object, or object that placemarks an area&quo… (View Post)

The post at the link actually shows part of the problem: A plain old sign would only be eligible if it has artistic or cultural relevance. Looking back at the AMA archive, this is reinforced by the J… (View Post)