ElwynGreygoose-ING
✭✭✭✭
ElwynGreygoose-ING ✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Postbox rejection
It always goes back to whether it meets any of the criteria. Who's going to go exploring to see a QEII Postbox, or even a George V Postbox, come to that? (View Post) -
Re: Footpath Rejection - Please Clarify
I don't know anyone who would accept this. A footpath sign basically says "this is for public use, like any road or street, but only for walkers - no vehicles or horses". (View Post) -
Re: Low quality and Natural feature (Frivolous rejections)
That looks nice, but what is it? I think with anything like this (including stinkpipes), or indeed anything at all, the more information provided the better. Such as date, makers name, foundry, style… (View Post) -
Re: Confirm these markers are not eligable
Niantic just rejected my appeal of a named trail marker (full written name, not a colour, numbers, initials or symbol) as "mass-produced, generic". Where does this take the discussion? (View Post) -
Re: Spot the Fake: Are you better than Wayfarer support?
Spotting fakes is certainly not their strong point. (View Post)