ElwynGreygoose-ING
✭✭✭✭
ElwynGreygoose-ING ✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: State Survey Marks - Railway marks -Boundary Marks - Utility Marks - The nightmare grows
@tp235-ING I cannot see how these are eligible. No noticeboard is eligible in its own right; the question is, what are the notices? In the UK we have community noticeboards that advertise local socia… (View Post) -
Re: Low quality and Natural feature (Frivolous rejections)
That's a nice photo of tarmac and a motorbike. Without reading the title I could never have guessed what you were nominating @Viperveteran-PGO As @VladDraco-PGO says, in any case this does not meet a… (View Post) -
Re: Postbox rejection
That's up to you, really. Would that title/description convince you to go out of your way to take a look? Edward VII for example, you might well do, you may never have seen one before. (View Post) -
Re: Postbox rejection
Added to which. George V postboxes are also extremely commonplace and very few reviewers would accept them now. The same goes for most postboxes, actually. Now, if you can find a hexagonal Victorian … (View Post) -
Re: Confirm these markers are not eligable
Well yes, This is the position I have always maintained. But the solution is the same as it is for every nomination. It must be made blindingly obvious from the title and description which of the cri… (View Post)