Faversham71-PGO
✭✭✭✭✭
Faversham71-PGO ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: are they good places for nominations? please help me
Looks perfectly valid as a separate nomination to a chapel. As suggested by @NorbertG82-PGO try and avoid showing too much of the chapel in the photos. Obviously if you're hoping for it to appear in … (View Post) -
Re: The entire Wayfarer system is horrifically broken - An Objective Analysis
How did you think a family therapy centre meets one of the three mandatory critieria? Is it a great place to explore, a great place to socialise or a great place to exercise? Nominations have to meet… (View Post) -
Re: Confused about trail markers
Why don't you think they would be eligible? If there's evidence that they mark the route of a trail and therefore encourage exploration surely they're eligible? (View Post) -
Re: Gazebos, Pergolas, and Pavillions
No object is an automatic 5 stars - you've got to evidence that it's a great place to explore, socialise or exercise under current criteria. Did you clearly cover this in your text? (View Post) -
Re: Wayspots are supposed to actually exist, right?
You can appeal it in Invalid Wayspot Appeals - you'll need photographs of the location to how it doesn't exist though. (View Post)