JSteve0-ING
✭✭✭✭
JSteve0-ING ✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Should I try again?
It is an interesting looking sign with the motto of the community. I would have accepted this sign as eligible. It also appears safe to approach on foot to me. (View Post) -
Re: What the actual hell did this get rejected?!
I can't tell much from what you posted, but that looks like a water valve cover and it is not eligible. You did get a wonky reason in your email, but it should have been rejected. (View Post) -
Re: Today’s “I want a PokéStop at my house” reviews
-
Re: New Wayfarer Criteria Page missing Important Criteria
I feel those items you bring up essentially belong to the exploration category. (View Post) -
Re: Walking path in park an acceptable feature?
It could be eligible because it promotes exercise, especially if it has a lap distance marker. WIll it be accepted? That depends on the opinions of the reviewers. (View Post)