JSteve0-ING
✭✭✭✭
JSteve0-ING ✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Are "natural features" now allowed under Wayfinder 3.1?
Should have included this as well. (View Post) -
Re: Are "natural features" now allowed under Wayfinder 3.1?
It ia still a rejection reason in the actual reviewing process. (View Post) -
Re: Are "natural features" now allowed under Wayfinder 3.1?
I notice that "Natural Feature" is still listed as a stand-alone reason for rejection and that the picture of the lake without a sign is featured in the ineligible photos section. Based on … (View Post) -
Re: Golf courses under the new criteria
This is a fallacy. Wayspots do not need to be accessible by everyone. (View Post) -
Re: Universities?
Maybe it would be nice if it were explicitly stated that they were eligible, but a universities definitely fall into the broad category of a great place for exploration. (View Post)