JillJilyJabadoo-PGO
✭✭✭✭✭
JillJilyJabadoo-PGO ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: If I could wave a magic wand.
The point is that they aren't qualifying because of "explore", so it doesn't matter that they're mass-produced or boring. They are qualifying under "socialize". Whether they are a… (View Post) -
Re: Quick question on these two noms
@Hosette-ING not necessarily. The "natural feature" rejection is still given as an option in the drop-down even though it is no longer a rejection reason by the new criteria. Not saying I'l… (View Post) -
Re: Private property accessible to limited membership only
This post is about improper use of the private property rejection. If you have something getting rejected for pedestrian access, that's a different issue. The reviewers don't think it's safe or able … (View Post) -
Re: Inappropriate Pokestop
I mean, they could remove it as general abuse "Any other type of abuse that you feel is not in keeping with the spirit of Wayfarer's mission to create the most interesting, family-friendly, and … (View Post) -
Re: Seriously "submitter identifiable"???
You also have "Other Rejection Criteria", which means reviewers in your area don't think it's eligible. Community gardens are definitely eligible. We can't see your supporting text, but exp… (View Post)
