Can the watermark guideline be clarified once and for all by using a consistent phrasing? In the rejection criteria, a photo is described as ineligible, when it contains a watermark. Thats the versio… (View Post)

You missed the point that he was more than once pointed to the orignal criteria and other sources, but stood stubborn, which is no exemplary behaviour especially for someone who reviews publicly. So … (View Post)

Edit: Duplicate Comment cause the other one wasnt shown properly, so I had to rewrite it Thats on point. I agree that there is no need to punish this youtuber as long as he now stops doing these misl… (View Post)

Can the watermark guideline be clarified once and for all by using a consistent phrasing? In the rejection criteria, a photo is described as ineligible, when it contains a watermark. Thats the versio… (View Post)