Don't see anything from the pictures or the information provided that makes this stand out from similar type of businesses. I would have given it a one star -- sorry. (View Post)

In no way is it acceptable for multiple fake points of interest to be created under the justification that everybody plays the game their own way. It's flagrant abuse. The person(s) nominating these … (View Post)

The first pic just looks like a common plant. So that would be an immediate rejection. The other pics looks like a common grassy area/field -- not an official named park (ie. a sign). So very generic… (View Post)

All you have to do is look at approved nominations in game to give you a good idea of what a good nomination would be. Sure, there is a sprinkling of really old points of interest which aren't great,… (View Post)

Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water by trying to fix misuse of a field when not everyone is mis-using it. Again there are plenty of edits where coupling is very helpful. Surely there are… (View Post)