MargariteDVille-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
MargariteDVille-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Appeals Update - Discussion
faster resolutions on newer Appeals while we work on addressing our oldest Appeals. So yes, you may see that an Appeal you submitted recently will be decided before one you submitted longer ago and t… (View Post) -
Re: Incentivizing participation!
We've also talked of rewards for Trusted Nominators (100 or 500 nominations accepted) and Trusted Reviewers (20,000+ agreements, IOW more than the top Ingress medal level for reviewing). They could g… (View Post) -
Re: Who is actually doing the appeals?
I would think appeal reveiwers look at original primary and supporting pictures original title, description, and supporting information appeal additional text rejection reasons selected by prior reve… (View Post)Post edited by MargariteDVille-ING on -
Re: Stupid rejections again
Those who chose Temporary, thought it looks like graffiti that will just be painted over in a few months, or removed by the property owner. The Submitter Identifiable was probably just a stray click.… (View Post) -
Re: Locations For Review
They flat-out said they did, back in OPR days. You're hysterical, thinking they removed that code. The faction-check was SO rampant. (View Post)
