Nadiwereb-PGO
✭✭✭✭✭
Nadiwereb-PGO ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Supporting info - reject based on "need more pokestop" claims?
How? Why? It's a bad argument, for sure. But it's in no way more "influencing reviewers" than perfectly acceptable things like quoting the criteria/AMA. Even rejecting it because of this wo… (View Post) -
Re: New "submitter identifiable" trend?
having people in the supporting picture is not an identifying information. Unless it's a series of nominations with the same people/dogs purposefully put in the picture as a sign, it is not disqualif… (View Post) -
Re: The applicant who started numbering them as he liked. (Case at Warabi-City)
"Personally, I don't think we should be adding numbering to Wayspot titles that we don't need." You personally not finding something necessary does not make them abuse. This is not abuse. (View Post) -
Re: Abuse of Kurotoriyama Park (Case at Izumi-City)
Here's my opinion: K-1:Yes, it' slightly misplaced. Yes, technically that's abuse, especially if it brings another stop online due to S2 cell rules - but 22 metres of displacement is not something I … (View Post) -
Re: False Application (K12)
This is an ineligible nomination. Reject it. That's how the review system works. If it somehow gets accepted, report it as an ineligible Wayspot. If the report is denied, appeal it in the Invalid Way… (View Post)
