Ochemist-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
Ochemist-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Why didn't Niantic take the chance to educate?
Yes voting provides the reasons selected by normal reviewers but the staff members reviewing still have to have a reason they rejected it. The thing is that maybe they don't go through the same proce… (View Post) -
Re: Help! I truly cannot comprehend!
and add the URL in the description. I know this was probably a typo, but for anybody reading this who isn't sure, please add the URL in the *supporting information*; the submission should get rejecte… (View Post) -
Re: What counts as a low quality photo?
Even if the signboard is ugly and the building is beautiful, I'd always accept. Remember that submitters are motivated to use pictures of sign, as they are often the easiest path to acceptance. (View Post) -
Re: Restaurants - What are your own standards for accepting them?
I'm pretty lenient. If I search for the restaurant and it appears to be not a large chain and an established place with a significant number of 4-5* reviews on Google/Trip Advisor/etc., I'll approve … (View Post) -
Re: Upgrade is totally useless!
Counterpoint: Last time I checked, I had almost exactly the same acceptance rate for upgraded and non-upgraded submissions. I'm in the US, which might well matter, but my "local" area, like… (View Post)
