Raachermannl-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
Raachermannl-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: reviewers, that vote purposely against the criteria
Why are all of you now discussing again cabals? That's not the main topic here. Only again a thread, that leaves its main topic thanks to @Theisman-ING ..... Even @NianticGiffard didnt read anything.… (View Post) -
Re: reviewers, that vote purposely against the criteria
But nethertheless these are different cases .... Cabal guideline: A) We want as much spots as possible here. B) other shall not have them. Solo rejector guideline: could be evrything. The guy from th… (View Post) -
Re: reviewers, that vote purposely against the criteria
This thread is not about cabals at all. It's about single persons, that might know the criteria, but hate different aspects of them to totally neglect special types of valid candidates. This can incl… (View Post) -
reviewers, that vote purposely against the criteria
In the last weeks there have been examples in the international wayfarer discord, where someone admitted, that UK has a separat group of players, that think, that the Nia criteria are too lax, and th… (View Post) -
Re: Appeal-Vocations ....
@NianticGiffard @NianticTintino-ING now there is again an appeal rejection, that violates existing AMA-answers: Description text is roughly the story from the supporting text. So even if we neglect t… (View Post)