RandomExploit-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
RandomExploit-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Invalid Wayspot Appeal: Barking Creek Flood barrier (duplicate of already retired wayspot)
How does pointing out the bias of a group of friends backing each other up here equate to saying the original post is misleading? 🤔 It's the misleading info by your invested group of pals that I was … (View Post) -
Re: Trolls in the forum
As you said, the ins and outs can be discussed in that thread. You have admitted your bias and it's your group of friends involved in the portal/poi, which is all I was pointing out anyway. It's kind… (View Post) -
Re: Invalid Wayspot Appeal: Barking Creek Flood barrier (duplicate of already retired wayspot)
Access to the foreshore may be legal but no without inherent risks. "Can I visit the foreshore without a permit? <Snip> The Thames foreshore is a potentially hazardous environment which mu… (View Post) -
Re: Invalid Wayspot Appeal: Barking Creek Flood barrier (duplicate of already retired wayspot)
While I don't know enough about the area to say how accessible it is or not....I can tell you that all who have replied in this thread supporting it are friends who play together and are the ones tha… (View Post) -
Re: Trolls in the forum
Let's be honest though. You disagree because you belong to the group of friends who created the portal and want to use it to be a PITA to the opposite team. Your post is not inpartial, like all the p… (View Post)