RandomExploit-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
RandomExploit-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Stupid rejections again
Except I have had plenty of rejections with the URL rejection reason for having a URL in them. If I didn't have to deal with the ridiculous people rejecting everything with any reason they can find, … (View Post) -
Re: Stupid rejections again
Temporary....despite supporting photo, location on Google maps and further info explaining why the sign was done rather than the building... (View Post) -
Re: Stupid rejections again
Pedestrian access and low quality photo.... It's a path that also doubles as a very short road to a car park for 4 cars that no one really uses because of the bug car park the other side but seriousl… (View Post) -
Re: Stupid rejections again
A car in a car park is not a picnic table in the picnic area of a National Trust site. What an absolute ridiculous comment. But again shows how ridiculous some voters brains work. I shouldn't even ha… (View Post) -
Re: Stupid rejections again
Yup, common sense seems to have gone walkies and never returned for some reviewers. It's painful to try and watch them justify things like no pedestrian access. The submission in my initial post that… (View Post)