It should pass on the grounds of unique architecture, but being an apartment complex it may take a few attempts. The URL/Markup reason, assuming it was strictly put in the supporting information, was… (View Post)

It's something that should normally be eligible, but I think its location is probably what's causing it to fail. It does seem a bit questionable that there's a railway line within spitting distance, … (View Post)

Unfortunately, neither the sign nor the trail is eligible by the looks of things. Sign would get rejected for being generic (fault/laziness of the reviewers for selecting it as a business) and trails… (View Post)

Outdoor barbecues might be eligble, but it depends on the individual one. Something under a shelter that has multiple (particularly permanent) seating areas near it can qualify as a community gatheri… (View Post)

It could potentially pass, but you'd need to really sell its history and cultural significance in the supporting information, otherwise there's a strong possibility it will get rejected as a generic … (View Post)