The nomination is the "square", which is an intersection of two streets, one two lanes, and the other three lanes. Can't you say that a player can stand in the middle of the "square&qu… (View Post)

While I wouldn't oppose a change from good to great in the wording, the additional information makes it clear that what is meant is the eligibility criterion. But if what is suggested by the AMA and … (View Post)

Unless a nomination is no longer required to meet at least one of the eligibility criteria, voting 👎 on all three of them should lead to a rejection. If that is not how it is implemented, then it is … (View Post)

That would be a change to the criteria. A wayspot is not required to be distinctive. How about just ensuring that voting 👎 on the last 3 questions counts as a rejection? (View Post)

I don't think we "need" an explicit rejection reason for "doesn't meet eligibility criteria". A 👎️ on all of the last 3 questions should cover that. I do not think that there shou… (View Post)