flatmatt-PGO
✭✭✭✭✭
flatmatt-PGO ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Abuse of POI position editing
Niantic has stated that this is abuse; therefore, it is abuse. This is not what the description edit field is for. If a wayspot is causing problems, then the property owners or managers can contact N… (View Post) -
Re: Niantic can we do something about bad reviewers? I'm tired of unreasonable rejections
Well the two examples you chose are not very good examples, as neither of them is likely to meet eligibility criteria regardless. A drinking fountain or other drinking water supply does not meet crit… (View Post) -
Re: Criteria of my POI
It sounds like the sign is what they nominated, which wouldn't be eligible--the place itself is likely eligible. I think we need to see the full details of the nomination, including the title, descri… (View Post) -
Re: Criteria of my POI
I don't really see it. It's just their logo. Sure it's got a couple of 3D bits, but it hardly rises to the level of art. I guess it could be accepted with the right reviewers, but I don't think I'd g… (View Post) -
Re: Rules and Regulations Sign Rejected for "explicit or inappropriate activity"
A rules sign is not eligible on its own. In some cases, a rules sign could act as a proxy for the park itself, but only when there is not a better proxy for the park (usually a park name sign). The r… (View Post)