spiesr-ING
✭✭✭✭
spiesr-ING ✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Invalid Wayspot due to private property
"It's literally outside on a street accessible to everyone." That's irrelevant. It's on the house, which means it is obviously on the property of the house. The relevant question is "I… (View Post) -
Re: What should I change for this this Nomination to be accepted
What is the building behind/beside it? You will need to demonstrate that said building is not a private residence. Even though this shrine is outside of the fence, it is still clearly on the property… (View Post) -
Re: I AM DONE - reviewers as bad as never before
How can you confidently determine that said rejection reason doesn't fit without seeing the entire submission? (That post didn't include the location, so I can't see any way to pass judgement on the … (View Post) -
Re: Somebody massievly reporting stops...
How about you make a proper appeal of each individual removal separately like you are supposed to and provide all the required information and evidence that the removed Wayspots don't meet any of the… (View Post) -
Re: Give the lost Upgrade back to user when upgraded nomination is appealed and the appeal is accepted
Even in a situation your example, the Upgrade has still performed it's function by speeding up step 3, thus allowing to move to the next step sooner. (View Post)