Search
-
Re: 1910 Indian Shaker
Players are expected to use common sense when it comes to which areas that they themselves should or should not be accessing. However, as I stated, just because you personally don't have access, it doesn't mean other people are unable to access it. If limited access Portals were banned by the rules, then there would be no… -
Re: General shop disguised as art gallery
Wayfarer 3.1 Release Notes: New Criteria + Darkmode Welcome to Wayfarer 3.1. As noted in the Path to 2021 post, and our recent AMAs, we’ve been working on a big Criteria update, which we’re super excited to introduce to you. With this update, the Help pages for Ingress and Pokemon GO have been superseded and consolidated… -
Re: Explorers in Spain - Help Us Help You!
i think trying to get a clear understanding of PRP and what it looks like along with other things before the challenge will be very useful. ideally we can then pull outcomes into one place as an easy accessible resource. @PaulingZubat-PGO this is a good starter example. And it would be interesting to hear some insight into… -
Re: How long does it take for a pokestop nomination to be approved?
This feature is not working really well. I live in an area without too many landmarks and I try to promote the game itself by creating new pokestops. I've had 2 pokestops approved before so I can say that I0m aware of rules and regulations. I'm now waiting for more than 40 days for a pokestop that is "in voting". It feels… -
Re: Ungültiger Wayspot
Wayspots are only removed if they meet one of the following conditions: No Pedestrian Access Obstructs or interferes with Emergency Services Private Residential Property School (up to K12; including Day care/Child care services) Permanently removed from the location Duplicate of another Wayspot For all other cases, Niantic… -
Re: The portal is not available for secure access
There is no requirement for Wayspots to be accessible to all players or at all time. Restricted and limited access Wayspots are allowed so long as they do not meet any criteria for removal. The criteria for removal is as follows: No Pedestrian Access Obstructs or interferes with Emergency Services Private Residential… -
Re: Appeal rejected report
Sorry, this is the first chance I had to respond @AlexMTG-PGO. This has pedestrian access and is likely on public property. The closest that I can think is this is very near Christ the King Catholic School (part of Christ the King Catholic Church) on North Rodney Parham except accessible from Woodland Heights Road from the… -
Abuse of location editing

Title of the Wayspot:見附テクノ・ガーデンシティ(北) location:https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=37.540976,138.895328&z=17&pll=37.540976,138.895328 This may be a weak case of abuse. If you want to match the current photo of the spot, the current location is correct, but the proposed destination also has a large sign as the title of the… -
Help Improving Nomination

I’ve submitted a nomination twice and had it rejected both times for the following reasons: Nomination does not meet acceptance criteria, The real-world location of the nomination appears to be on private residential property or farm, Nomination does not appear to be permanent or appears to be a seasonal display that is… -
Re: Abusing the wayfarer privileges to take fields down
It is difficult to see, but to me it appears that the edit moved the wayspot way more than 10 meters, so it must be an old request. It is way more likely that someone moved it for it to be more easily accessible than to destroy links or fields. It usually takes time for such a request to be processed, and there is no way…
>1190 results