Search
-
Re: Appeal rejected invalid Wayspot: Waysport with no public pedestrian access.
Must be safe and publicly accessible by pedestrians (indoor or outdoor) It says it must be publicly accessible, and this is not the case. Only employees can access. Regarding the abusive locaation, the first part of the rule says it's placed to provide advantage. Having a POI you can access from your work place, and almost… -
Re: Appeal rejected invalid Wayspot: Waysport with no public pedestrian access.
For the record, If Niantic considers it to be a valid POI, I'm not gonna complain (in fact, I have like 6 POIs I can submit in the place where I work, but again, is not publicly accessible). But if they are going to allow it, then they should change both the Wayfarer documentation and the test we need to perform in order… -
Re: Appeal rejected invalid Wayspot: Waysport with no public pedestrian access.
Thank you for your reply @NianticOtoStar could you please then remove this from the Acceptance Criteria criteria in the wayfarer site? Because it's clear this POI has no publicly access. Only employees of Bayer can access the property (and the POI). Must be safe and publicly accessible by pedestrians (indoor or outdoor)… -
Re: Appeal rejected invalid Wayspot: Waysport with no public pedestrian access.
Imagine in Ingress having a link to that POI, that a only a few people can access. That's...quite common and has been encouraged by Niantic since day 1. Consider this Ingress AMA response from 2017: Q69: What do you think about portal candidates located in internal area of residential condominium, with access restricted to…
4 results