Search
-
Re: Invalid Wayspot Appeal
Wayspots do not need to be accessible by everyone to be valid. This isn't a private residence, so as long as anyone who works there can safely access the wayspot on foot, then that's good enough for Niantic. Given that the object is a pergola, that suggests it is very much intended to be used by pedestrians who have access… -
Re: Invalid Wayspot Appeal
There are four main categories for acceptance. Meet one of three criteria. This can be considered "A great place to be social with others", albeit mainly for people at that business It is a permanent physical, tangible, and identifiable place or object, or object that placemarks an area "Must be safe and publicly… -
Re: Invalid Wayspot Appeal
That is not how that works. First, let's take on point 3, as that's the rule you are claiming this wayspot breaks. In November 2020, the subjects of public accessibility and safe pedestrian access were both brought up: How does “publicly accessible” apply to locations that have limited access, like members-only clubs,… -
Re: Invalid Wayspot Appeal
The criteria literally says "Locations that are intentionally and strategically placed to provide advantage to a single player or collective group." You could change a few of the words to read as follows, using wording more closely aligned with what you stated. Locations that are intentionally and strategically placed to…
4 results