A normal vertical garden wall, which is non distinct?

I had a rejected appeal this morning for a 5 storey green wall inside an office building, which I thought was absolutely stunning. I’d never seen one before, and thought it was extremely distinctive! Can someone please take another look?

Wow, that is incredible! This was an automated process rejection, right? So the community never got to see this?

Yeah, the appeal person was the only reviewer to see this as it was an ML rejection

I’m sorry this happened! As a holder of a recent appeal rejection for a “normal walking path” (actually a named trail section known for fossil hunts, but not prettied up by the rather poor locality) I feel your pain.

I’m just laughing at “normal vertical garden wall”.

I would just resubmit. If there is any chance of getting a better photo, that would help. I am guessing that would be difficult!

I took it at the weekend from a public walkway that goes through under the office. Presumably if I could get access I could get a better picture but I also do not think my image is rejectably bad. If I cannot get it to people to see it, there’s no point resubmitting is there :sob:

It’s not rejectably bad, just looking to get past the ML rejection :slight_smile:

I also think this is a very cool nomination, and I’ve never seen anything like it at all. The appeal reviewers must live somewhere very amazing if they think this is ordinary and non-distinct.

Truly not sure why this was rejected by the ML - surely it deserved to get to the community at least? And the appeal rejection for this “watspot” is ludicrous!

ML probably struggled because of the photo - it couldn’t tell what this was and couldn’t tell it was anything.

The appeal reviewer was just going along with the “community” decision, probably.

It also depends on the evidence presented for consideration.
I think it would have helped to have either the hanging planters dominate in the middle or the wall ( which I presume is to the right). So what the auto system sees is glass.
I agree this is hard to photograph and capture the scale.
So perhaps a case of something you see and think cool but hard to convey that in a 2D image :woman_shrugging:

Wasnt replying specifically to Salixsorbus

I’d say I see worse photos than this hit community voting. It just seems random what it knocks back and doesn’t from the stuff I see people post as having been rejected by the ML. There’ll be multiple people in the foreground, but that’s good to come on through to the community (and I’ve seen some of those end up on the map). It doesn’t make sense to me at all.

I had two normal-street-name-signs to review today, which I am extremely surprised got past the ML rejection, since it took all of 0.01 seconds to know I was going to reject them. So I agree with your confusion.

cant imagine the difficulty of the process for taking care of plants up there lol. Would be funny if they dressed someone up like a spy and had them rappel down from the rafters to take care of the plants

I really feel like the ML should be rejecting outright coal. A garden seems like something for the community to vote on to me. Whether you agree this meets criteria or not (I personally think it’s very cool and would explore it), I don’t see how it’s coal and deserved an ML reject.

Meanwhile I’ve reviewed multiple nominations at K12 today, and I see them in game in the US all the time. The ML can’t pull that stuff instead?

Ended up resubmitting since the original appeal wasn’t overturned. Had to use a photo that will look awful on the photo disc to get it past the ML, and then reviewers rejected it for private property :woman_facepalming: but the 2nd appeal was accepted. Now there will be a nice view of some glass on a photo disc untill I can go back and update the picture to one with the green wall actually in the centre :joy_cat: I have no idea why this one had to be such a long drawn out ordeal

That’s actually a decent photo that looks interesting :slight_smile:

Imagine how it looks with only the middle within the stop circle though. Just glass :woman_facepalming:

Thanks for update.
And nice to hear good news.
Sometimes the photos that enable a wayspot are not what we actually prefer……but it gives us an excuse to revisit and submit a preferred picture.
:smiling_face_with_sunglasses: