こんにちは！私は、ほぼ同じ内容の対象物、例えば、お地蔵様、祠、何かの案内板などを申請している時にふと疑問に思いました。ナイアンティックは正式名称がない場合は区別させることを推奨していますが、正式名称がある場合については言及していません。同じタイトルになり得る対象物はサブタイトル、例えば、場所などをWayspot の名称に加えるべきでしょうか？
私は次のように申請しています。
①対象物の名称+地名
②対象物の名称+付近にある物体+前
みなさんの意見をお聞かせください！
Hello!
It’s definitely a good idea to try for titles that are as unique as possible, this is indeed part of the title guidance.
Beyond that, if it is something like a series of objects with one shared name, or items of one type (“Trail marker”), I have been known to use both geographical (Trail marker at Street Crossing NNN) and landmark-based (Trail marker next to Train Station NNN) identifiers, depending on what would fit best, be more unique and help people find it the most easily. I don’t think there is a definitive guideline on this, nor should there be one - it sounds like a situation where you as the person on-site would be largely qualified to make a guess on what would work best for this specific situation and location.
Is this in line with your question?
2 Likes