No es la 1a vez que mis propuestas no son del agrado, les es mas facil calificar una imagen de una virgencita en mi pais que un sitio establecido que carezca de ella. Soy de la opinión que deberia ser un trabajo para otras personas y no para cualquiera que No vive en la zona, e incluso ni en el pais, absurdamente las rechazan cuando aceptan otras que estan en calles cerradas, en escuelas, considero que es gente inepta, y sin idea que solo lo hace arbitrariamente ennlugar de realmente analizar las propuestas.
Welcome to the forum!
If you had some nominations rejected and would like our advice, can you share screenshots of the full nomination ie title, description, support information and both images? We can try to help you figure out what happened 
Hello and Welcome,
Please do not put all Reviewers in the same boat.
Most will review as they read the criteria, they have no benefit from Rejecting eligible nominations.
Without seeing your nominations we are unable to state why they may have been Rejected.
Most reviewers will be local and they do not consider them eligible, reviewers from further afield will only be sent your nominations if you have used the “Upgrade” option.
Stay Respectful and we will try and help.
Hi and welcome! Is this a security guard post?
I’m afraid in this case the reviewers weren’t wrong at all, as this doesn’t meet eligibility criteria as this isn’t a great place to explore, exercise or socialize. A nomination has to meet one of these core criteria (just “existing” is not sufficient).
In addition I doubt the security guards would want game activity to interfere with their work, so you’re likely to hit the “obstructs emergency services” rejection reason as well. I would give up on this one and look for something else in this area instead. Try starting by checking out the criteria for a good nomination in more detail: https://niantic.helpshift.com/hc/es/21-wayfarer/section/166-wayspot-criteria/
I also want to point out that nominations can also be rejected by an automatic process, which would mean there is no need to be upset at your fellow reviewers. To confirm this you would have to take a screenshot of your nomination on the Wayfarer website, where rejection reasons would be shown. In any case, like I said, the rejection is correct.
For your next nominations, I would suggest not discussing Pokémon GO or Pokéstops in your supporting nomination field. I know the nomination interface makes it confusing, but everybody who reviews already knows you want a Pokéstop. You would have much better odds if you used this space to explain how your nominations meet criteria or bring additional proof of their location and/or existence.
I know this is a lot of new info - please let us know if you have any questions.