Do Niantic reviewers know what art is?

[wooperIooper]

After a Niantic reviewer rejected a sculpture last week, they just rejected an appeal for a large-scale piece of art that is well-documented and by a well-known artist as being a “normal decorative wall”. I don’t really understand how a unique piece of art does not meet criteria.

This is the website for the artwork by the University of Tübingen’s art collection Ohne Titel – Works – eMuseum

And the artist’s wikipedia page that features the artwork

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Nagel_(Künstler)

And two extra links for the artwork

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Metallrelief_Zahnklinik_Tübingen_Detail.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Metallrelief_Zahnklinik_Tübingen.jpg

[elijustrying]

What is art is a very subjective question with differing views.

However this is a recognised and documented work of art. The links to websites should have demonstrated its validity so there seems to have have been a mistake in reviewing.
I hope this can be looked at.

[wooperIooper]

I ended up resubmitting

[elijustrying]

That’s good result