Fake or not -- trying it on - OR have I missed something

Got this.

Zero evidence there is a street art mr men trail that I could find online nor a Silkwood art trail… Also if an official trail would expect to copyright symbol.. Just saying replicating without recognition (etc etc) is a legal issue anyway and I would not support it anyway if it were a real painting - as that copyright is an issue…

The steet view does show an access lid in the street near the POI (( the lid )) is the thing Mr Greedy is painted on (see in first picture). the other POI bottom of map view. Was also a Little Miss. It too was on a ““manhole”” (Access lid that might be in second picture)

Supporting photo did not show manhole in context to its surroundings either. Just some grass around it. So was really hard to say if the same one!!!

I call it something not real. But love to get other views. Cause if I am wrong - need to learn :slight_smile:

And if right then questions around the other noms that appear to be in the DB

Thoughts please in case I get another one.

Note: Modified text as further research showed an access lids in the street.


1 Like

Sharing the full resolution photo helps us with the investigation, its a lot more difficult as a screenshot.

Sorry @RoIi112 moved on - it is here - or not as the case maybe Google Maps I have modified my original post as I found at least two access lids in the street in street view. Not sure if they line up with POI but lids do exist. Sadly no paintings on them in street view.

I can find no evidence of a street art view trail in Silkwood. Nor any Mr/Miss Men trail. And as I said the supporting photos provided zero context which was frustrating as they could have proved where the access lids are…

Did the supporting photo also have the same painting on it, but taken from a different angle?

I’ve seen a few of these too and have been reporting them as fake. Supporting photo never shows both the manhole and the surrounding, it’s either just the surroundings or the manhole from the same angle but zoomed out a tiny bit. Street view usually doesn’t have a manhole. And the pictures look so clean - no sign of dirt or weather wear.

2 Likes

This is only a crop of your review page, but looks extremely fake to me.
Very likely that it’s the case of the approved one on the nearby too, so looks to me like the submitter is the one being Mr. Greedy.

4 Likes

Looks extremely fake to me, there is no texture on the pink at all

1 Like

@TheJunster2two Yes spot on. A bit further away with more grass around it. BUT zero context. Just a bit of lawn. So no trees, housing, road and no ditch. And if google street view correct that fence is very very close and that was mssing…

So yes good question and yes you are right

I saw these, and thought the exact same thing! Thanks for saying something because there were quite a few things that were off when I saw it :+1:

2 Likes

How did you reject them? I feel I should have chosen abuse… Really needs to be checked out.

I feel with AI this is only going to get a lot lot lot lot harder :slight_smile:

Well, I’ve voted on two of the Mr Men artworks:

The first one I skipped because I was in the middle of improving my rating and wasn’t 100% sure that I would agree with the community. Pretty sure it was the blue one you can see in the screenshot, but I might be wrong.

And the second one (this one) I rejected for Accuracy→Bad Photos+Inaccurate Location because I couldn’t find any part of the nomination on the maps and they made no effort to prove it existed…

I’ve been seeing quite a few AI nominations lately :smiling_face_with_tear:

1 Like

The wayfarer team do pick up on posts like this so they are likely to comment at some point.

In light of where this has gone to I’ll amend the title of this topic to making it clearer.

1 Like

That will be good. If they do, I hope they look at all the Mr Men/Miss nominations in the area - not just this one.

Thanks for amending my title… :slight_smile: Yes - you write better than I do :slight_smile:

1 Like