Has the ML system relaxed its rejection rules of ineligible wayspots?

General Discussion
1

image
image384×512 120 KB

It doesn’t really matter what the title and description are, but this is an immediate rejection. I haven’t seen the criteria being changed and I don’t remember things like this getting through to community review previously.

Has anyone noticed the ML system being more generous and allowing more clearly ineligible submission through to reviewers, which feels risky as some people think the anything ML “accepts” is therefore eligible.

2

Hey, i changed the title of this post. I changed the word “removal” to “rejection”. I know what you meant, but i want to avoid any confusion since ML does not REMOVE wayspots. It does REJECT nominations, which then removes them from the voting pool we reviewers get to see.

3

I have noticed it doesn’t reject scenic benches and other things that were iffy in the past, but maybe it just learned that they can be acceptable