I’m at a loss here. I thought the appeals people at least would understand the definition of SFPRP (single family private residential property) but they still messed up. They completely ignored everything I said in the appeal. So I’m coming here for help.
It’s a kid’s play area accessible to the neighbourhood attached to a townhouse complex of 8 units. I linked the real estate listing in the appeal. “Not publically accessible” is wild when you can literally just walk in from the sidewalk and the link I gave lists the play area as an amenity for the neighbourhood.
I was asking for advice in a wayfarer discord and they suggested I post in here. So here I am.
Even appartments can have private back yards. It looks like scopley thinks this little side yard is owned by the appartment closest rather than being a shared space used by all residents. If there is a way to show it is different from the private spaces then that may help.
Welcome to the forum 
It’s a difficult one to quickly perceive as being shared space, since it is in-front of one residence, but there are good indications that it is shared.
This is the streetview (zoom in!) pointing at what I believe is the access to this space. Multiple apartments appear to have access and there is no direct access from the residence this is next to.