Literally what more could I have done?

I would like to preface this by saying I am not at all looking for advice I am just complaining.
I broke down how my submission fit in every guideline and they still deny it for being insignificant…. Like what is the point in this if effort is punished?

Did you reply just to tell me I’m venting wrong?

Since this forum is populated with people who want to help, it’s slightly jarring to see threads where people demand not to be helped. The only previous one I have seen was someone who only wanted Scopely staff to respond, despite it being abundantly clear to us commoners what the issue was.

Absolutely not! I wanted to know what feedback you were looking for, and tried to show that you are not alone. I did not want to give an answer to your topic title question since I read in your post that you did not want advice, but wasn’t sure what you were looking for. I tried affirmation, but I guess that wasn’t it.

Okay I’ll deleted it if it’s not allowed sorry, how do I delete it?

I’m the problem

I didn’t say it was not allowed :slight_smile: No need to delete it.

(This specific area has potential fwiw.)

It is hard to convey that this dirt path is not just a blocked road as the appeals team saw it, but they did say that if their assessment was not correct, you could resubmit.

And if you do want help with a resub, there are a lot of folks who could help. Sometimes it is very hard for me to see something the way it looks to others.

Way after the fact, my comment asking to clarify what the OP was seeking with this post was removed.

They had asked a question with the topic title, but said

So I asked what feedback they were looking for.

The conversation does not make sense without that piece there. I did not say anything mean. Why would I devote hours and hours to helping on this forum to be mean? I am furious that my well intentioned comment was removed.

Mod edit: Removed the part promoting a third party platform.

I remember your post. It was not giving advice and was supporting the op.

The only thing I can think of is that it was effectively directing the op to go to a third-party website.

Oh you mean by mentioning the Wayfarer Discussion Discord exists? I did not say to go seek that out.

I can’t remember exactly what you wrote and can’t check :frowning:

I’m just trying to think of the most likely reason for the post being completely removed (instead of being mod-edited).

Oh, you were right! I did not think I had promoted them in any way, just mentioned that it was a widespread issue that was recognized there as well.

Aaron feel free to DM me when you don’t want me to say something. I do try to keep notes.

Please understand that reviewer and staff are just human and can make mistake. If you really believe your nomination fit the criteria (personally i think yours have potentioal) you are free to resubmit them .you can wait for few days in case staff revert their decision before deciding to resubmit.

Btw is this chair? I think if its chair, it will have more potential than road blockade