Local reviewer(s) incorrectly rejecting for URL in supporting info

[saltssaumure]

Some of my submissions are being incorrectly rejected for containing URLs in the supporting information. The rejection reason should only be used for URLs in the description, not the supporting information. Links are allowed in the supporting information, and I use them to prove the location’s existence, especially where the street view is outdated or there is none.

To be clear, this is not a wayspot appeal. I would like to resubmit these (with improvements) and let the community decide if they should be accepted. I’m just asking that the reviewer(s), who are misunderstanding the URL rejection reason, be informed that they are doing it incorrectly.

Example 1

Example 2

Example 3

Example 4

Example 5

Happy to provide more info if needed

[cyndiepooh]

I have been using help chat to “Report Player Abuse” to ask them to send educational emails when this happens to me. IDK what exactly they do, but they “take action.”

fwiw:

@NianticAaron

Infact, we encourage including links in the supporting text.

[cyndiepooh]

Phooey, I used the wrong screenshots and deleted the post trying to fix them. This was the last time I used help chat for this reason.

The next time I did one of these, I explained that I had already filed an appeal.

[saltssaumure]

Thanks, I’ve just made a report in a similar style. Hopefully the reviewer gets a heads up.