Currently reviewing this nomination - their supporting info stated “Slightly moved the location over so it is reachable by the path”
Rejection Criteria states “Locations that are intentionally and strategically placed to provide advantage to a single player or collective group. Or location edits that attempt to move the Wayspot away from the object with which it’s associated (for example, moving the Wayspot to a different city/country or moving it to a more convenient location).”
My question is what’s the general consensus on these sort of nominations? Because it does seem like it’s not feasible to reach the nomination if placed properly, but it’s been moved to a more convenient location. Is it completely against the spirit of wayfarer? (for reference the s2 cell it would’ve been in if placed properly)
1006 River Haven Cir, Charleston, SC 29412, USA ← location for anyone who wants to look around the location - doesn’t seem like it’s placed to try to get a waypoint at someone’s home or anything
It looks more like a pond aerator than a fountain, which are not eligible. The correct location would be on the object, and the object doesn’t have safe pedestrian access, so easy reject.
