Hey guys, I would like to get your opinion on this as I appealed this POI beacuse it was rejected to not having a pedestrian pathway. The second picture clearly shows that it’s beside a sidewalk. The appeal is already rejected. Is there a way to re-appeal this?
Welcome to the forum!
There is no formal procedure for appealing an appeal. If you would like to post screenshots of the nomination, we can discuss the rejection. Sometimes an appeal rejection will be overturned based on a post here, but not always.
4 Likes
Hey guys, I would like to get your opinion on this as I appealed this POI beacuse it was rejected to not having a pedestrian pathway. The second picture clearly shows that it’s beside a sidewalk. The appeal is already rejected. Is there a way to re-appeal this?
glad you posted this here. no pedestrian pathway is clearly a wrong appeal decision from the supporting photo. do you recall what the original rejection reason was? or was the original rejection also for unsafe access?
do you have the coordinates where you submitted this? they will be after the second photo in the submission email if you still have that.
1 Like
The pathway doesn’t seem to lead anywhere. It ends abruptly few meters ahead. I wonder if that had anything to do with the rejection reason.
@qweytr654123 are you comfortable sharing the location details?
if this is the right area, the street view from 2024 shows signs indicating that improvements are being made. this sidewalk already exists even then, and the retention wall is kind of improvement the old sign suggests is being made.
2 Likes
Can we have the exact location please.
I found a few possible going along that road but couldn’t quite match for sure.
It is clear all the way along that the pavement walking area switches around a lot and people were walking along it.
2 Likes
Hey Thank you for the reply, Here is the exact location.
Yes this is the correct location.
He, here is the exact reason for the rejection: The nomination object does not have a pedestrian pathway that leads all the way to the object
Seems like reviewers didn’t do the best job, as there is a sidewalk that pedestrians can safely access, and the appeals decision also is incorrect. Also, it looks like the sidewalk was expanded, as the utility pole is now in the sidewalk, when it used to be in the grass before the retention wall was there.
Hopefully staff can take another look at this.
2 Likes