Rejected Disc Golf Hole Removals

  • Wayspot Titles: Frisbee Hole 1 ; Frisbee Hole 2 ; Frisbee Hole 3 ; Frisbee Hole 4 ; Frisbee Hole 5 ; Frisbee Hole 6 ; Frisbee Hole 9

  • Locations (lat/lon): 42.116517, -76.815988 ; 42.117029, -76.816867 ; 42.116740, -76.815790 ; 42.117515, -76.816177 ; 42.118437, -76.816505 ; 42.117691, -76.817878 ; 42.115467, -76.817817

  • City: Elmira, NY

  • Country: USA

  • Screenshots of the Rejection Emails (do not include your personal information):

  • Additional Information (if any):

The text for all of my reports was along the lines of the following:

As per the clarification on the forum, there should be one wayspot for an entire frisbee golf course rather than several wayspots for individual holes. This wayspot should either be a sign for the course as a whole, or the first tee. As “Eldridge Disc Golf Sign” already exists at 42.115459, -76.815815 and represents the course as a whole, that makes this wayspot a duplicate of it. Golf & Disc Golf Courses

I’m unsure why these reports were rejected when I gave a clear link to the clarification about disc golf courses. As stated, there is already a wayspot representing the course as a whole, which is “Eldridge Disc Golf Sign” at 42.115459, -76.815815. Below is the image for that wayspot, which is a map of the course, and you can clearly see the 7 holes from this post listed on the map, plus holes 7 and 8, which haven’t been submitted as far as I can tell. As the course is already represented, the individual holes should be retired as duplicates, surely?

Thanks for the appeal, @hankwolfman! We gave this a second look and decided to retire the Wayspots in question.