The same playground

Wayspot Appeals
1

I tried to report earlier that one playground was divided into two way spots, despite the fact that they were located on the same area prepared for the playground. As far as I understand, this should be considered a duplicate.

Duplicate name:

детская площадка

IMG_20251106_032356
IMG_20251106_0323561080×1463 409 KB

In our country there are no age restrictions between playground elements.

Here’s the same playground from a slightly different angle. As you can see, there are no age signs.

Screenshot_2025-11-06-02-41-28-154_com.google.android.apps.maps
Screenshot_2025-11-06-02-41-28-154_com.google.android.apps.maps1080×2340 568 KB

2

those are 2 different subjects, just the same playground

4

There’s a thread here that says they should have been nominated as one playground

Playgrounds

5

I suggested they create an appeal category post. This uses the correct means to ensure staff has the attention that general discussion posts may not be given.

6

And I just saw that.

1 Like
7

In that picture, you are showing a single playground that can only have one legitimate wayspot representing it. Any second wayspot is a duplicate that has been slipped through the review process but should not have made it through.

Playground areas can have multiple wayspots in some circumstances, as you have alluded to. For example, if there are multiple playgrounds each with their own physical boundaries and aimed at different ages. This is an example (I haven’t checked if there are multiple wayspots, but there are definitely separate playgrounds) : Google Maps

The playground in the pictures posted above does not have any reason for being considered as separate parts. People try that in the UK as well and I hope reviewers don’t accept it.

8

Thanks for the appeal, @DenialN1! We took another look at the Wayspot in question and decided that it does not meet our criteria for removal at this time.

1 Like