Hello @Superzwaan
This discussion has been about approval not removal.
And the outcome was that these are eligible to approve provided you are satisfied about location accuracy which was the only issue.
So your phrase about “ do you want them to be removed again” doesn’t make sense, since they haven’t been removed.
You also say “reduce the fun for fellow trainers”
This is a wider point not related to this case.
Wayfarer involves real eligible objects in real life places. If any wayspots meet removal criteria then they can be removed. These are very often maliciously created so that some people can be at a distinct advantage over others. So removal is simply returning the situation to how it should have always been, before the “rules of the game” were deliberately broken.
これはスキー場のコースのトレイルマーカーになり得ますか？もちろん、設置する場所は十分に配慮する必要があります
()
If that is marking the start of a ski run (trail), then I would consider that eligible. I’ve successfully submitted the starting markers for mountain bike trails.
If it is pointing towards where the ski runs start, it is just a direction marker and not eligible.
コースの分岐と難易度、スキー場のどの地点にいるかを示しています
I’ve also successfully submitted an intermediate marker on the same mountain biking trail.
This is a trail and that is a trail marker. The only issues are whether you can show safely accessible to pedestrians and permanence. Are these markers taken down when the season finishes or do they stay up?
私はその懸念についてよく理解しています。少なくとも布以外でできた部分は1年中ささっていることがわかります。「ここは①-4」だけでも、十分に位置を表すものだと考えられます。歩行者のアクセスについては、この対象物がコースの端にあり、多くのスキー場では、コースの端で立ち止まることは認められていることから問題ないと考えます。
If the poles and the green marker on the right remain up permanently, then this is a permanent trail marker even if the trail isn’t in use outside of the season.
I still have a concern about pedestrian access. People can stand at the edge of the course, but this isn’t at the edge - it’s in the middle. I don’t think this to safe to access for pedestrians!
