University nominations keep getting rejected

I have submitted lots of wayspots recently on University of York campus, which is completely accessible to the public (all cycleways and footpaths). A 10 second Google search yields several pages that explain how it is open to the public. On top of this, the university is not a K12 facility in any capacity. It is a higher education teaching and research institution (staff and students 18+). Many smaller wayspots I have submitted have been accepted quite quickly, but many of the larger genuine landmark buildings I submit are being rejected as private property and for being a school… The attached submission I even added extra detail in the supporting info (after initial rejection) to try and stress that this is a public campus and pedestrians can explore all of the buildings (certainly from the outside at least). It’s a serious failure of reviewing that these buildings are being rejected simply because the reviewer isn’t reading the supporting info. I am also conscious that I can only resubmit it once unless it gets considered spam. But why does it seem to always happen with the most wayspot-worthy buildings and locations on campus?

Title: the dianna Bowles building, university of York

Description: The Dianna Bowles Building (and lecture theatre) in the Department of Biology. Named in honour of Professor Dianna Bowles, a pioneering biochemist at the university who established the Centre for Novel Agricultural Products (CNAP) and received an OBE from Queen Elizabeth Il for services to plant science.

Supporting info: NOT private property. The university campus is fully accessible to the public. The building is also easily and safely accessed via pedestrian walkways that come from Vanbrugh and Wentworth colleges. This is a landmark building for the campus. It hosts university lectures, academic seminars, and guest speaker events. It is named after Prof. Dianna Bowles (received an OBE from the Queen for services to science). This directly aligns with Niantic’s criteria as a major landmark for exploration, especially for students at the university.

I have seen many of your nominations going through Review.

Just my opinion, I don’t think a University building is eligible just in itself. It is a place that students go to learn.

I assumed that many do not agree with this which is why I have “Skipped”, seems that many do agree.

Even when the text points to communal areas inside the building, as I have never entered it and apart from your words I saw no confirmation I also skipped these.

Good Luck.

We were just talking about the lack of reviewer education on the Wayfarer Discussion Discord, and this is a perfect example. Reviewers assume they know what “Private Property” is and don’t click the tool tip to see that Niantic means to reject private residential property. Reviewers know what “Schools” are and don’t click the tool tip to see that it means K-12 and under. This would have been any easy accept for me from what I see here, unless there is something about the location or the full main photo I am not seeing.

I appreciate the feedback, and I will endeavour to get more interior photos from now. But I don’t know whether this would even affect reviewers who are convinced that the campus is private property and a school? None of the submissions have been rejected for not being distinct or culturally important etc. It’s always “school” or “private property”.

I wholefully agree. Especially the “private property” denial needs to be reworded to “private residential property” desperately and probably even needs a small text below it reiterating the criteria. In general, I think it would be sensical to explain the denial criteria in small texts like the report button does.

I wonder if there is any point in reporting to help chat that these reviewers are reviewing incorrectly so that they can be sent educational emails? I hate sending scary warnings to people, but somehow they need to get feedback.

I did do a report like this, but idk what happened on the other side:


That’s sounds like it’s worth a try, thanks!