I’ve got a question about neighbourhoods that back onto ravines and green spaces with trail systems connected at various points throughout the neighbourhood.
Specifically, I’m wondering about trailheads that are clearly a trailhead or access point to a trail system, but that don’t have signage. They’re not on private property and are obviously maintained access points to an official trail. They have bollards with reflectors to prevent access to vehicles, ATVs, etc, like most pedestrian/cyclist only trails. Some entrances might have a sign posted by the city saying pedestrians only, no vehicles, horses, etc.
These seem to be hit or miss when it comes to getting approved, and the ones more likely to get approved have a more visually distinct feature (like a set of stairs, for example).
Basically, I’m wondering if the less visually interesting, yet obvious access points / trailheads are eligible or not? I’ve had some rejected for not being ‘permanent or distinct’ and I’m debating whether it’s worth appealing them (via Wayfarer, or the Wayspot Appeals category), or if that is a waste of time.
I can post example photos if needed, but since this is a general question, I’ve opted to keep it generic for now.
