Wayspot Removal Appeal: Frederik IVs Segl

When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:

  • Wayspot Title: Frederik IVs Segl

  • Location (lat/lon): 55.680839,12.575317

  • City: Copenhagen

  • Country: Denmark

  • Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information): N/A

  • Additional Information (if any):

This Wayspot was removed during the past week. I am struggling to understand why, and hoped you would be able to clarify and/or restore the Wayspot.

The Wayspot is a medallion stone, as pictured, set on the facade of a ‘kollegium’ (student dormitory), in one of Copenhagens oldest buildings from 1703. The building itself was given protected status as one of the first when Denmark made laws to preserve older buildings in 1918, and has been the living quarters for many famous Danes during their time at university, including H.C. Ørsted, but that is a fun little aside I suppose.

The medallion stone itself is a sandstone relief with a portrait of King Frederick IV of Denmark, and was put there to honor him as the reigning King when the building was finished.

I think there is plenty of historic value in the monument (from 1703!), the location was correct, it was not on a single-family private residence. I do not understand why it was removed, and if it was nominated today I would 100% lean towards approving it as a great place for exploration. I would love to be more precise in my appeal (or understand why it wasn’t a good Wayspot), so I hope you can share the reason behind its removal.

Thanks in advance & all the best,
Jakob

Ps.
The name was slightly off; perhaps more correct would be “Sandstensrelief med portræt af Frederik IV”, as a ‘Segl’ would technically translate to ‘Seal’ (as in the type you would use to seal a letter with wax), though it is often used as in the English ‘Sigil’ (as in “The Sigil of House Baratheon”) - but I guess it probably isn’t a technically incorrect phrasing that got the Wayspot removed :-).

Good luck. The wayspot was exactly where you said [it’s still in Ingress] and is on the exterior of a multi-residential property.

One explanation is that the property owner asked for the wayspot to be removed. Since there is nothing about the location that suggests it is ineligible, this is a distinct possibility.

Thanks for the appeal, @JakobHelms! We have taken another look, but stand by our decision to retire this Wayspot.

1 Like

Thank you very much - I take it that at least confirms that it was not due to a report from the property owner?

Can you share any reasoning behind the choice to retire it? I would love to hear whatever you can share, given that I might nominate the building itself, but would not want to step on any toes :-).

Hey @JakobHelms ,

:100:

Based on the evidence available to us, this object has been removed. If this information is not accurate, please provide a video of the facade and we will reconsider.

Well I certainly hope not, given that would be illegal due to the buildings preservation status :-)! I’ll be sure to snag a video later this week. Thanks for clarifying!

2 Likes

Here it is in Google Streetview for 2019 (It is also present in 2024/2022/2021, but at a worse angle/blurred/visual glitch), for a comparison shot where you can see more of the facade:

I was randomly by late last night after a film, so here is a video of the street both ways + facade. It is dark and windy and not very clear (I also tried to disable the audio due to the wind, but if audio is not properly disabled, beware - volume warning!): Watch FrederikIVWayspotVideo | Streamable

I took this picture too:

I can definitely still see the object, but I’ve also been there a thousand times. Completely understand if these are not clear enough for you, in that case just let me know and I’ll make sure to get by later in the week at some point during the day instead of in the middle of the night :-).

Best regards,
Jakob

Thanks, I have restored the Wayspot in question.

6 Likes