This was removed due to it not being permanent or distinct but it’s been there for 5 years, it’s next to the main road on a path way, legit no idea
Welcome to the forum 
The rejection reason “not permanent and distinct” comes up in three situations:
* reviewers did not think the object is permanent
* reviewers did not think the object is distinct
* reviewers did not think the object meets any criteria (exercise, explore, social) and wanted to explicitly reject it, so reject for not “permanent and distinct” because that is the advice from Scopely Explore
It is very likely to be the last of these that reviewers rejected for. If you want to share the full details of the nomination, it may be possible to explain why you got this result.
Hello @markoxddd1
Welcome to the forum 
I’m not entirely sure what you nominated just from the one photo. Could you please take screenshots of your complete nomination and share it here. We would be able to give you much more detailed feedback that way.
Hey, often grafit in Eastern Europe has been created by vandalism which is not allowed. From what you shared it is not clear yet if this was the actual problem, but it is the most common issue in the region:
i’m on pc now but basically it is a graffiti made by students about a book store, it’s on the pathway to the park and that pathway extends further to the school
it is a graffiti made by students about a book store, the translation of the graffiti means “My Book” it is not vandalism
Hello and Welcome,
Nobody is saying this is vandalism, what is being said is that you need to include evidence that it isn’t when nominating.
If this is authorised by either the business owner (and it is on his property) or the authorities then IMO I would Title it as a Mural.
In this case there should be some evidence, is there anything on the business website, was it covered by local news etc.
Remember, it is down to the submitter to prove the nomination is legitimate.
Good Luck