TY, and I will leave this for others to research. It got “not likely to be AI-generated” on the checker I used, but I am not techy.
Could you also post your supporting image in full resolution?
I understand why you’re upset, if you took the picture yourself, and someone is falsely accusing you, you have every right to be upset.
But I also agree with the other’s that your wording is very strong.
Often the best way to prove that both the location and the wayspot is correct (if not visible on streetview), is to create a short video.
Anyway stay alert, as very often people will receive a warning/ban after being accused of using fabricated pictures, so to avoid this, it could help you if you have some evidence.
Anyway, hope this is fixed soon.
Perhaps it’s not first time something 100% valid get mistakenly rejected for lies (abuse, offensive, ai photo etc). And when they get rejected by staff, it’s clear they’re not doing their job correctly.
Btw what do people use to detect 3rd parties and AI photos? I ve been told you can’t even upload Ai Photos.
We should be glad that the appeals are done by real human beings. And most people will occasionally make mistakes, that doesn’t make them ignorant, but only proves they are also just human.
Finally the rejected appeal has been converted into an accepted one. Thanks the one who converted it. I just hope it isn’t going to happen again
5 Likes