Why was my report to remove a pokestop rejected? It's a shop selling LPG cylinders

When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:

  • Wayspot Title: Indane Dharitri Service

  • Location (lat/lon): 26.108396,91.807566

  • City: Guwahati

  • Country: India

  • Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):

  • Additional Information (if any): How can a gas agency be a pokestop? It’s a generic shop selling LPG cylinders. I don’t think that’s a place where people gather to be social or that it has any historical significance.

Why would you want to remove a pokestop? Unless it is actively in the way of something what os the problem?

So that nearby places that do qualify for pokestops can be appointed instead of a gas agency. It could even be a safety risk to gather near gas cylinders to play. I don’t understand the point.

Thanks for the appeal @FireflyGirll . We reviewed this location again and stand by our decision to not retire this Wayspot.

So it’s possible to nominate generic shops as pokestops? I could nominate another gas agency then?

Please refer to the below links for more inforation on these Wayspots:

Thanks, I will check them out and see where I misunderstood.

You didn’t misunderstand, it is not possible to submit it under Wayfarer criteria.

The Wayspots you reported were bit accepted through Wayfarer, but added through the game team, that’s why they don’t follow the rules.

The criteria for actually removing something is not the same as the rejection criteria, but is also not published, so you can’t remove things for simply being in violation of Wayfarer acceptance criteria

Wow, that’s confusing. I don’t think there should be such a difference in what players can nominate and what the game automatically appoints as pokestops. There’s a playground nearby that’s not a pokestop but a gas agency is!

Not everyone is under the assumption that “More Stops = Better Game”, most Wayfarers prefer an accurate map.

I think most people would agree, when these imports where announced the question was asked whether community submitted wayspots would override “imports” and it seems the answer is no. Once they are in the game they stay unless there is a real reason to remove. I believe “safety” is not an issue. People are expected to visit the location anyway so no different if playing a game.

This is either because no-one has submitted it or it is part of a school. If it is public property (or shared private property), you can submit it.