Appeal for Rejected Wayspot Removal - Multiple nearby wayspots

Since these three wayspots are too close to each other, I have merged them into a single post for description. I hope this doesn’t cause any inconvenience.

  1. 壁球馆
  • Wayspot Title: 壁球馆
  • Location (lat/lon): 30.510789,114.413606
  • City: Wuhan
  • Country: China
  • Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):
  • Additional Information (if any): Please refer to the additional information at the end of the post.
  1. 卷卷凝思大学魂
  • Wayspot Title: 卷卷凝思大学魂
  • Location (lat/lon): 30.510942,114.413779
  • City: Wuhan
  • Country: China
  • Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):
  • Additional Information (if any): Please refer to the additional information at the end of the post.
  1. 60万元石碑
  • Wayspot Title: 60万元石碑
  • Location (lat/lon): 30.510575,114.413674
  • City: Wuhan
  • Country: China
  • Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):
  • Additional Information (if any): Please refer to the additional information at the end of the post.

Additional Information:

Firstly, according to street view, by comparing the streetlights at the same location (as indicated by the red frame) in the two photos, the sign for the “壁球馆” and the original building has been removed.

For the remaining two wayspots, based on the photos, the surrounding environment consists of residential buildings and a sports stadium, making it impossible for them to be located here.

Another piece of evidence is that the wayspot “卷卷凝思大学魂”, based on the available photos, has the same design as the “石” wayspot located at 30.512867, 114.408432; additionally, the soil and lawn on the ground of the “60万元石碑” are similar to those of the “石” wayspot.

Based on all the information above, I believe that all three wayspots mentioned in the post should be removed.

Thank you very much for your patient reading.

Thanks for the appeal, @qmxha2vozwtv. After reviewing the additional evidence provided, we’ve decided to retire 2 Wayspots in question. We took another look at the Wayspot “壁球馆” in question and decided that it does not meet our criteria for removal at this time.

OK, Thank you! I will consider updating the photos and description of the “壁球馆” wayspot to be more accurate with the current condition of the location.

1 Like