If you have no clue you probably have the option to skip when reviewing appeals do you not? If you are clueless why not skip or press I don’t know?
Appeal of an appeal denied for ”natural features”, calling a Viking stone ship grave a ”common rock”
In academic writing you don’t have to provide the book to use a source you usually are able to provide a page number and state where it came from.
And to reiterate, are you not expected to use street view to verify if something exists when reviewing. Answer that question as so far no one has said no to it.
At the risk of going in circles (and let’s please stop doing so), I don’t need proof that it exists, I need proof of what it is. These are two completely different issues. This has been made extremely clear by everyone in this thread so I’m not sure why you are ordering specifically me to answer. “It’s not going to be read” is condemning yourself to a rejection without even trying.
And what I am complaining about is the lack of knowledge of the appeal reviewers, if the average community is more knowledgeable than the ”experts” is there not an issue with that?
If you don’t know you can skip.
Also if the appeal reviewers are the ones who have a track record of not reading how is it my fault for finally realising and not adding it.
What bother? Find your appeal statement in your contributions, copy, paste.
The Niantic Note recommends that if the assessment is not correct (they are humans, after all) that you resubmit with more context. You chose to go with less.
Different submissions, can’t add more to the prior ones I appealed as there isn’t anything more you can add. I can’t add more than the image of the map, the text from the article, the article link and the article number. If they aren’t paying attention to those why even add them.
I did not say add information to this appeal at this point, I said that you have the ability to copy/paste the copious information you say have already provided previously into a new appeal when you make one. Maybe you can use that suggestion for a future appeal if you end up making another one.
This is not getting anywhere. You began this post asking for someone to be removed from their job for rejecting your appeal, and refuse to take any responsibility for the lack of information that reviewer you want fired had to work with. I hope some of the community comments have been helpful to you.