Do I appeal this?

[winkawesome]

I would like some feedback of if I should appeal this nomination or not. This nomination is located 100% on public property and does not suggest people from walking on private property.
I know it may look like it is on private property but it actually is not, according to the City of Vancouver. The nomination is publicly accessible and is culturally significant. A fence blocks people from even attempting to go into private property as the property line straddles the side of the house, which is provided in the image below. Here is a link to the City of Vancouver Property Lines Map, ArcGIS Web Application where if you click the window icon in the top right of the service, you can select the satellite map view. If I decide to appeal this, what are my chances for this appeal to get accepted?

City of Vancouver Property Lines Viewer:

Nomination Details:
Title: Garden Genie Mosaic
Description: A colourful mosaic tile art located on public property.
Rejection Reason: This submission is on private property which is not publicly accessible
Location:

Image:

Supporting Image:

[seaprincesshnb]

That 100% belongs to that house.

[winkawesome]

It’s on public property though? Just because it belongs to the house does not mean it is on private property. Why do Little Free Libraries get accepted then, if it also belongs to the house in front of it?

[DTrain2002]

Not all of the LFLs in front of PRP are actually on public property. Per the clarification, if it appears to be on PRP, it should be rejected. However, not everyone may know this, so they may accept a LFL on PRP.

LFL clarification:

@NianticTintino

Little Free Libraries (LFL) can be eligible for nomination, but their location is critical to whether they can be accepted. Little Free Libraries with safe access on sidewalks outside of apartment buildings or on municipal or communal property are eligible. Those on single-family private residential properties (SFPRP) are ineligible.

PRP clarification:

@NianticTintino

**Easements, “right-of-ways,” and sidewalks are too broad to make a global statement on, but the guidance is the same as above - if it is part of a private residence, it is ineligible.

Whenever I find an LFL that appears to be on PRP, I do request removal.

And yes, I agree that in this case, those are the steps leading up to the entrance of the PRP, so I would reject it. I also would think if there was an emergency here, you wouldn’t want players to obstruct this entrance to the home, but my primary rejection reason would be PRP.