Im of the belief that if people care about what they are submiting, and want to make sure they are actually doing more than creating a game item, that they will look into all this information. Thats what I did when I first started this process. I dug into the Criteria Clarification Collection and read through this: Top Mistakes Made When Nominating and How to Acoid Them. I also did read through the sites additional pages. Its definitely up to the desire of the individual on whether or not they care enough to learn more. We could cram a large exam on people instead of a simple test and we would still have the same issue. Yes some might come out better educated while others still wont care and submit whatever they wish was a game thing. Clarification is good but I dont think we need to have all the detail and legalese in every single place. Anyways, if that happened Id doubt the people in question would even read it let alone follow it. To many submit things just to see if it will go. Ive even seen people submit things like stop signs with “Testing” as descriptions…(all these were reported)
1 Like