I’m also from a third-world archipelagic tropical country but from Asia.
Simply saying that might not work as well as stating what activities tied to socialization, exploring, and exercising is supported in that public space. Specify details when applicable.
That is also subject to the same Wayfarer criteria as those submitted through Pokemon GO. The difference would be how each game chooses how and which wayspots are used for their gameboard.
There is already a wayspot for "Parque Pasivo Sency’ which is in the same cell as “Street simulator in park”. If you are unfamiliar with the inclusion rule for this game, here is an article explaining it.
refer to the tooltip under Appropriate from the review page:
This is why basing off of existing wayspots is not good practice for your own nominations. Wayfarer is an imperfect process which the reviewer, submitter, and Niantic itself can make mistakes. It may potentially be eligible for removal if it is truly pedestrian inaccessible. However, pedestrian access but limited to a subset of the public is still allowed as seen in the screenshot.
I highlight that each point of interest still has to meet eligibility criteria. Simply being on the allowed locations does not equate to meeting the eligibility criteria.