Stoopid submitter, put your articles and additional information in the supporting text box
Just gonna put these here… apologies for the tl;dr
I got a whole plethora of rejection reasons for this one, PRP, unsafe, bad photo, generic business. There’s not as much information out there on this specific engine shed so I had to rely on using what is available such as old OS maps, and tying it to the railway company who built it, and it’s relevance to todays railway preservationist world, here’s my supporting links if you want to go read them yourselves.
Just want to check, you guys can see the 2 links in my supporting right? they do actually exist right? I’m not dreaming? do appeal reviewers consider literally any of the information I bombarded them with in the appeal statement?
3 Likes
I love this nomination, and given what the response was from the appeal reviewer they cant have looked at your nomination much at all. You gave a lot of detail
I very much hope this can be overturned
4 Likes
Yeah, the other UK submitters know me as the person that will literally just throw essays of information at you, I’ve been asking @PkmnTrainerJ for longer description lengths for years ala Scanner Redacted back in the day, purely so I can write multiple paragraphs of text that no one will bother reading 
2 Likes
Youd hope that the appeals team who are literally paid to read it would though 
1 Like
Doubtful, they’ve got “handle time” targets, minimum amount of time they’re allowed spend on each individual submission, otherwise stuff like mine would turn their KPI’s into negatives as they’d be sat hours reading everything
I do believe the time they’re given must be very short, maybe less than 30 seconds per review or something. Otherwise they could have scrolled down to see your links were provided
3 Likes
I do love railways and everything connected to them.
The building was always designed to be very functional, and not to impress. It had a job to do. And still being around and that link to the history of those Victorian railways is what now makes it interesting.
It’s difficult on screenshots, but I don’t think I would be overly impressed by the photo, but I wouldn’t have rejected it. But we do have some reviewers in the U.K. who like perfect photos.
I think the range of community rejection reasons points to people being on the edge of it being a yes or no. Possibly a number of IDK.
However this is about the appeal.
The comment about give links is clearly not correct when they are given.
2 Likes
Thank you Eli, yeah this is the 2nd appeal rejection reason for not putting my links in my supporting.
***Mod Edit to remove unwarranted comments about the Wayfarer Staff
I have removed the comments about the staff involved as they were unnecessary and disrespectful. We try to treat everyone in here with respect.
It is simply a case of waiting to see if there is a response to your post about this.
2 Likes
And I thought that was quite tame 
but okay then
