I just wish they would communicate better. Im sure there’s a lot going on in the background which is great, but if they don’t tell us what’s happening and keep us updated on progress people are going to feel left out and ignored.
If we feel that we are taken seriously, involved and informed there will be a lot less frustration and ill will toward the wayfarer team. They need to work to build back trust and a big part of that is clarity and communication.
6 Likes
I thought that was intentional so that all those old clarifications that were never part of the current criteria could be forgotten and start from where the currently published criteria take us?
Personally I dont think we should be adjusting what we do based purely on a forum post -many reviewers and submitters do not come here. So it makes sense to me to reset things and then if anything changes based on a discussion here, the criteria should also change.
I do remember a lot of what I saw posted on the old forum but I don’t feel like I should apply that to today’s reviews. I should just apply the current criteria.
4 Likes
Hopefully it is general clarifications and not certain people commenting on trail markers
4 Likes
Tough ****? The people will have to wait regardless
1 Like
Oh, I needed a good laugh!
I also don’t understand why people think I’m making a fuss about how long things can take around here, when I’m not. I’m a quality over quantity submitter, and would prefer things not be rushed if that means it hurts the quality.
Also, please keep discussions civil @MoogModular.
2 Likes
A general reminder to remain respectful and consider that there will be a range of views.
And it is interesting to read the comments
3 Likes