It seems like The AI system has accept everything when a guy was out on a walk.
It’s written in Danish. But it means “Private Forrest”
In my opinion It should not go thru. Because it’s limited to a few people.
56,0864451, 8,9755790
Being limited isn’t a rejection reason.
As long as these few people have safe pedestrian access, it’s fine.
2 Likes
Being limited to a few people doesn’t effect a Wayspots eligibility.
Since Aug 16th I’m at around 70% being decided by 
excluding photo and description, title edits.
31 Emily accepts.
11 community accepts
2 community rejections
Most of those are in relatively low density areas though so my community accepts may be a bit higher than most others who may have a 90+% acceptance rate from Emily over the last few months.
1 Like
Oh I dint know. I thought it was under the same categories as “liquor stores or strip clubs” (like when you were introduced to wayfarer)
But if it’s a place that’s not accessible for everybody. What’s the point of making the stops?
For the people who are allowed to be there.
1 Like
And to create a map of our real world 
2 Likes
@XtreemAwesome
If you stop to consider further, there are places that are limited entry such as amusement park or holiday villages /camps those might have areas described as private forest but if there are objects within them they are fine as there is no requirement that everyone should access all the time.
1 Like
How is it different from “private farmland” which should be rejected?
This very reasonable question made me look more closely at the sign. Google Lens is making it difficult for me to translate it in a presentable way, but this is very different from a farm where a family lives.
To the forest guest Welcome to this private forest. The Nature Protection Act applies here. This means, among other things, that: You may travel from 6 to sunset. You must walk on all roads and paths. You may cycle on roads and paths that are suitable for ordinary bicycles. For reasons of privacy, you must not stay closer than 150 meters from residential and commercial buildings.
Do not take branches from trees and bushes or dig up plants. From 1 March to 31 October, you must not smoke near coniferous stands, grassy forest floor, heather areas or young stands. We ask that you put waste in a waste bin or take it home. In special cases, the forest may be closed. This will be apparent from additional signage. Access is at your own risk. Scooter driving prohibited
There are many of these access point in the area, although I don’t see anything at the exact coordinates the OP gave in Ingress:
Privat skov
Privat skov
Privat skov
Privat skov
Privat skov
Privat skov
Privat skov
Someone does need to edit those titles though…
2 Likes
Amusement parks are seasonal and therefore in that limited of time its open for everybody!
But as long the forrest isnt gated/fenced then its apparently allowed
Is the correct way to give them numbers?
Privat Skov #1 #2 etc?
They are open to those that pay.
There are plenty forests that are fenced and gated that is not an issue.
I don’t usually just assign numbers if I can figure out any other way to do it. I can’t tell what I would do in this case not being on site.
The seasonal rejection isnt designed for things that are only open during for example the summer season, its for things like christmas decorations that will be removed after a few weeks and won’t be there at all for most of the time.
We have alot of those signs in Denmark. Its the same type and the same ‘department’ thats issuing them! They everytime near the highway. And in every section where there is no trees but a path for machines etc…
Did knew that was accepted! Thx m8
I did not mean to say that these should be accepted because I am not familiar with them. I was just saying that they did not seem to me to meet removal criteria, which is different from acceptance criteria, and is what i thought the original topic of this post was.
If these are just rules signs for using the forest, and not trail markers to indicate access points, then I would reject them in voting.
It’s just rule signs how to be behave when it’s a private forrest. And they are just put were there is some gabs between the trees
If that is all they say then I would conclude they don’t meet criteria and are not acceptable.
2 Likes
But one of the rejection criteria is literally private property. I disagree with this.
It’s not they Have personal biases and they think this should go through in my opinion it definitely should be removed as soon as possible people who are nosy and want to spin poke stops could go to this “private forest” which in America a lot of people hunt on their private land and do other activities that might not be safe for people who just see a “poke stop” on the map.